beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.02 2014가단207014

부당이득금반환

Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 20,298,060 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from June 28, 2014 to October 2, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 29, 2012, the driver C of the B urban bus that belongs to the Plaintiff’s mutual aid association that has joined the traffic accident, operated the bus around 10:50 on June 29, 2012, and entered the bus stop in front of the bus stop in order to stop the bus when it comes to the bus stop at the 1041 North Korean Southern-dong bus stops in Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, where the instant accident occurred.

The point of the accident in this case is at the right angle, and three lanes in front of the bus stops are located in the three-lanes of the bus stops in order in a rectangular white solid line. At the right edge, three spaces in the area marked "b" are located in three lanes, and the safety zone of the yellow solid lines is installed in the right edge.

The Defendant, while running a bus on the right side of the bus following the bus, continued to run the above safety zone where the traffic of the bus is prohibited without reducing the speed of the stob, while entering the bus stops, while passing through the bus at the right side of the bus, and the lower part of the left side of the stoba left side of the bus was cut off with the rear side of the bus and the outer side of the stoba, and the Defendant came down between them.

The C driven a bus was stopped after the Defendant turned about 1.5 meters from the bus in order to cover the situation between the bus and the Indian boundary.

In the instant accident, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as an injury to the left-hand part of the satisfaction 10 weeks of medical treatment, a pressure duplicating damage, and a duplicating duplicating duplicating, etc.

B. The police of the investigative agency’s internal investigation of the instant accident was found to have entered the bus stops by the Defendant driving a safety zone established at the edge of a three-lane and confirmed the entry into the bus stops, and concluded that the Defendant was negligent in the accident, and concluded the internal investigation of the instant accident on the ground that there was no personal or material damage to the bus drivers.

Evidence: Evidence Nos. 1 to 9-4, the whole pleadings.