사기
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) stated false facts as if the defendant did not work for another seafarer, and received 62,750,000 won in total, such as wages, food expenses, etc., from a court by falsely claiming the amount of 62,750,000 won for the preservation expenses for the custody of the vessel, and such false statements by the defendant constitute an act of deceiving the court, but the court below acquitted the facts charged in this case. The judgment of the court below is erroneous by misunderstanding
2. The facts charged and the judgment of the court below
A. On July 3, 2009, the Defendant submitted a request for the management expenses of vessel crew members of the Incheon District Court of Law No. 30,500 won from July 3, 2009 to July 2, 2009 to KRW 2,4640 (one million for two crew members of each month, KRW 1,50,000, KRW 1.500,000, KRW 288,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 300,000 per month, KRW 1,000,000, KRW 308,000 per month x 308,000 won per month x 8,000 won per month, KRW 1,50,000,000, KRW 1,964,000 from each of the above court employees of the victim to KRW 1,50,000 from August 26, 200.