물품대금
1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).
purport, purport, and.
1. From 201 to November 20, 2013, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant, who operates a restaurant of “C” from the date of 201 to November 20, 2013, supplied the Defendant with a scam for scam, and on November 20, 2013, the price of the goods that the Plaintiff had not received was KRW 7,446,00 (the balance carried over as of February 20, 2013 was KRW 7,508,50), and the Defendant is obligated to pay the said amount to the Plaintiff.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments stated in Gap's evidence Nos. 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9-1 through 3, the balance of the goods price of February 20, 2013 is KRW 7,508,50, and the balance of the goods price of November 20, 2013 is KRW 7,446,00, and the balance of the goods price of KRW 30,00 is KRW 30,00, KRW 206, KRW 306, KRW 30, KRW 205, KRW 200, KRW 306, KRW 40, KRW 306, KRW 30, KRW 206, KRW 200, KRW 16, KRW 205, KRW 30, KRW 16,00, KRW 31,20, KRW 200, KRW 136,201.
The following circumstances revealed by the above facts of recognition, namely, ① the balance of the end of the business year 2012 and the amount carried forward to the business partner director in 2013, are different; ② the amount of the above business partner director and the amount of the sales partner director and the amount of the book of the records of the records of the records of the records of the settlement; ② the Plaintiff asserted that on December 31, 2012, the amount of the accounts receivable against the Defendant was KRW 16,470,000, but the said amount was to be reduced at the demand of the Defendant and the sales at discount and the Defendant’s request.