In light of the overall circumstances of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

However, the Defendant did not regard the period of repeated crime and committed the instant crime. There are many same criminal records, and thus, it is necessary to impose criminal liability corresponding thereto. Accordingly, the lower court is determined that the Defendant’s age, family relationship, character and conduct, environment, etc., and the Defendant’s proper sentencing conditions are imposed in consideration of rehabilitation treatment, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.