beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.10.23 2015고단465

공문서위조등

Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months, and the defendant D by imprisonment for eight months; and

However, as to Defendant A and D, it shall be for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A [Defendant A] carried on the business of referring to the name, contact address, credit card number, etc. from a person who wants to borrow a credit card to a third party with the name of the person who wants to borrow the credit card, and the credit card number, and then remitting money after deducting the fee from the purchase of electronic equipment, etc. on the Internet, along with F (Action against the Detention of the Daejeon District Law, February 20, 2014), G, H, I (Action against the Non-Detention of the Daejeon District Court Act), and I (so, February 11, 2015).

F preside over the “de-opener” business, H and I conspired to take charge of the role of directly consulting with the applicant for a credit card loan, G to forge the identification card necessary for the application for issuance of an authorized certificate necessary for the settlement of credit cards via the Internet, and the Defendant to take charge of the issuance of an authorized certificate for use by using forged identification cards.

【Criminal Facts】

A. On November 20, 2012, the Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, in collusion with F, G, H, I, etc., provided that: (a) the Defendant provided a credit card number, etc. from L to the Internet through a computer installed in the relevant location; and (b) wired L with money calculated by deducting approximately KRW 30 percent from L’s credit card information, such as commission fees, to L by means of financing money of KRW 11,283,149,60 in total from November 20, 2012 to January 28, 2014; and (c) provided money by means of financing money of KRW 11,283,149,60 in total from L to December 28, 2014.

(b) No person who violates the Digital Signature Act shall be allowed to have an accredited certificate issued in the name of another person;

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant is at C and Chuncheon Chamber of Commerce and Industry who work in the office of Gangwon-do.