손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. Establishment of liability for damages;
A. The Defendants, around 16:30 on November 10, 2012, disputed the issue of repair of the Plaintiff and boiler in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Seoul. Defendant B, by launching the Plaintiff’s bicycle, conflict on the Plaintiff’s clothes and alleys. Defendant C, on his hand, pushed the Plaintiff’s knick with the Plaintiff’s knife at one time and knife the Plaintiff’s knife and knife the Plaintiff’s knife onto the floor (hereinafter “instant assault”).
(2) Accordingly, Defendant B received a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 due to the above criminal facts on January 18, 2013 (Seoul East Eastern District Court Decision 201Da17963), and subsequently withdrawn the request for formal trial on May 9, 2013.
3) On December 28, 2012, Defendant C was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment due to the facts suspected of the above suspected crime. [In the event that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5-1, 5-3, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]
B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants are jointly obligated to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the assault, etc. of this case.
2. Scope of damages.
A. 1) Fully considering the purport of the oral argument as a whole, the Plaintiff’s medical certificate Nos. 5-1 and 6 as to the medical certificate Nos. 5-1 and 6, the Plaintiff’s medical examination of the following and the pelvis’s pelvise was diagnosed on Nov. 12, 2012, and paid KRW 20,000 with the issuance cost of the medical certificate on Jan. 23, 2015. (2) The Plaintiff asserted that, when the Plaintiff came to go beyond the Plaintiff, Defendant C did her satisfe the Plaintiff’s pelf, and her pelfe the Plaintiff’s pelf, and caused the injury to the Defendant’s stairs. Accordingly, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,400,00 with the issuance cost of the dental certificate on Nov. 24, 2013; and that the Plaintiff spent KRW 1,400,000 with the dental certificate No. 300,50 for dental treatment expenses for the next ten years.