The sentencing of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case, the fact that the crime of this case was committed only once, and that the defendant was committed only once, had a total of 11 times the criminal punishment, including the fact that the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime. In particular, the defendant was sentenced to one year and eight months after the release, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of crime, and even if he was sentenced for one year and eight months after the release, the defendant was committed the crime of this case. In addition, considering the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, circumstances favorable to the defendant, after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, it cannot be deemed that the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition