국가유공자비해당결정처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is reasonable, and therefore, it is cited for this decision in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The plaintiff asserts in the appellate court that there is a proximate causal relation with the performance of duties, since the escape from a signboard has been caused or aggravated beyond natural progress by drouting the drout of the work of destroying a well for food accommodation around 1984.
However, even if all the evidence presented at the first instance court and the appellate court were collected, the plaintiff was able to perform the work as alleged by the plaintiff.
In addition, it is difficult to readily conclude that the protruding escape from a signboard was caused or aggravated beyond natural progress, and there is no other sufficient evidence to regard it as such.
Plaintiff
We cannot accept the argument.
Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for lack of reason.