However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Defendant’s 01:55 Date B 01 Dosan City C’s Gaba

In the main room 2, while drinking alcohol together with the victim E (n, 37 years of age) who is an employee of the victim, the victim “the day F died and the day of birth is the same as that of F. In North Korea, the victim was found to find out that F was unable to grow due to the death of F. In North Korea, the victim was forced to get off and live in South Korea.” Even though the victim stated that “I would like to say that I would like to play the same talk, I would like to see that I would play the same talk without going through the victim, and the victim was able to get off the back of the dangerous object on the table, which is a dangerous object on the table, and the victim was able to tear the victim’s left part of the eyebrow, and caused the victim to tear the above eyebrow for the treatment days.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and inflicted bodily injury on a person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the victim's photograph and the remote photographic;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant, who had been punished three times prior to the occurrence of the crime of the same kind of crime, left away from the body, which is a dangerous thing, and inflicted an injury upon the victim's eyebrow, in light of the motive, method, and result of the crime, a strict punishment is required, but the defendant reflects the defendant, and agreed with the victim, etc. shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that the defendant completely agreed with the victim.