beta
(영문) 대구지방법원의성지원 2017.05.24 2016가단1580

건물 및 토지명도

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. C and the Defendant have a dispute 1) A church conference (hereinafter “instant church”).

) The D Religious Organization Empics Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Empic Association”) shall be called D Religious Organization Empis

(2) On March 6, 2012, the E Workers’ Association moved C, which had been a pastor of the instant church, to a senior pastor and appointed the Defendant as a successor pastor.

3) Since July 29, 2012, the Defendant deleted the indication of “Loman C” from the bulletin of the instant church from July 29, 2012, and C filed a petition to the ENo Association. 4) After organizing the 7 exclusive right committee for the instant church (hereinafter “the exclusive right committee”) on May 29, 2013, the ENo Association summoned Defendant and C on June 14, 2013 and on July 5, 2013, and conducted a verification inspection by visiting the instant church on July 21, 2013.

B. On July 14, 2013, when the resolution of 12 persons including the defendant, etc. on July 14, 2013 and the head of F, the defendant and the head of F, who were investigating the Plenipotentiary Conference, held a joint conference of the instant church and proposed the following agenda items, and passed the following agenda items with the consent of both the defendant, F, G, H, I, J, K, K, M, N,O, and 12 persons present at the meeting:

(hereinafter referred to as the "Resolution"). (1) Change of representative: Change of the name of representative of the instant church from C to the defendant. (2) Adjustment of expulsion and school register: From the school register of the instant church after May 2012, 300, 7 members, including C, Q, R, S, T, U, V7 (hereinafter referred to as "C, etc.") who unclaimed the instant church without permission and attended for another church, are excluded from the school register of the instant church, and the instant church members are identified as Defendant, F, G, H, I, K, K, L, M, M, NA, M, NA, P, X, 15 (the Defendant understood that the remaining 13 members, other than Defendant and F, were accepted as teachers). < Amended by Act No. 11373, May 14, 2012; Act No. 11308, Mar. 3, 2017>