However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2013 Highest 779"

1. Around 04:50 on October 14, 2013, the injured Defendant: (a) requested a victim G (the aged 21) who is an employee to charge the Defendant’s mobile phone at the E F convenience store located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) without any justifiable reason, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as destroying the victim’s leg, etc. following the need for approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment.

2. Performance of official duties or injury;

A. On October 14, 2013, at the above convenience store around 05:00, the Defendant threatened a victim I (the age of 29) with a slope H belonging to the Sinsan Police Station, such as a slope H (the age of 29) who was dispatched after receiving a report from G on October 14, 2013. The Defendant threatened the Defendant with the following injury: “I will die, she will die, she will she will die, she will cut off, she will cut off, she will come back, she will become aware of the she will die, she will do so.” On the other hand, the Defendant threatened the Defendant with the above I’s left fright, walking the face one time after receiving a report from her head, and used the Defendant as a bladation of sher, she will walk the body of the said H, walked the she once in the face, and sold the she part of the she.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officers with regard to the 112 Report On-the-spot verification, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on said I, such as a sinsum, which requires treatment for about 10 days.

B. On October 14, 2013, the Defendant was subject to the investigation of the Seosan Police Station and the interview room located in the Dong in Seosan-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and the execution of the procedure for the confinement of the detention room by the victim (the age of 39) who was affiliated with the above police station and the interview room in the above police station, and the Defendant was expelled from the above C, and the Defendant was expelled from the above C, and the Defendant was “I did not know about this, and I did not know about how I do not know about the tax base, tax base, public prosecutor, and prosecutor.”