The Defendant, in the position of a managing director in the position of a managing director in the position of a managing director in the position of a main business team of C (hereinafter “C”), was engaged in the business of receiving piece rates according to business orders. On December 2, 2013, the Defendant introduced the victim E as the actual authority of the managing director in the position of the managing director in the position of the main business team of C (hereinafter “C”), and introduced the victim E as the victim E as the actual authority for the interest of the managing director in the first place.

On February 2, 2014, at the victim E office in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, the Defendant would lend KRW 100,000,000 to the victim’s (hereinafter “C”) in the office of the victim E in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, to the effect that the Defendant may immediately start construction and sell apartment units, and that the Defendant would be able to sell apartment units, and that the PF loan from the financial rights will be repaid within one month.

In addition, it can be seen that the right to sell apartment units by proxy is given, and if two months have elapsed, it can be seen that all the sales have been made.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the above apartment complex was suspended for 7 years and the right to attract construction cost of approximately KRW 8 billion has been exercised. Since C did not have any construction contract of the above apartment complex, it was difficult for C to immediately commence the construction project and sell the apartment house or obtain a loan from the financial right, and there was no possibility for C to repay the money borrowed from the PF loan to the victims within one month. Furthermore, it is difficult for the Defendant to have a bad credit standing for about 10 years prior to the bad credit standing. Moreover, even if the medical expenses for the extension of the construction period were not fully paid for 10 years, even if it was borrowed from the damaged party, C did not have any intention or ability to actually use the money for sale and profit-making.

After February 12, 2014, 23,000,000 won from the victim H, which the Defendant came to know through the introduction of the victim E, to the new bank account (I) of the Defendant, around February 12, 2014, and the same year.

3. 12. The new bank account (J) of the Defendant 10.0