One (Evidence No. 1) and Raber (Evidence No. 2) respectively.

On November 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 14:20, in the “DP” for the operation of the Victim C located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant: (b) opened the main body of a computer installed therein using an employee’s negligence in his care; (c) deducted two SSD cards from the market price; and (d) from then on March 21, 2015, up to March 21, 2015; and (d) up to March 3, 2015, the “Quantities” in the separate list of crimes indicated in the separate list of crimes Nos. 26 in the separate list of crimes; and (d) the “Quantities” in No. 4, No. 48, the “E” in the “place” in the “F”; (d) the “100,000,00 won” in the “10,000 won; and (d) the “Quantities No. 920,914,” in the “Quantities 29,” number No. 265” column 1, respectively.

In 125 times, the number of computer parts equivalent to 19,359,000 won was cut off.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each investigation report and each occurrence report;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Written statements of victims;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture: (a) considering the Defendant’s age, family relation, environment, circumstance of the instant crime, details, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., including: (b) the Defendant’s age, family relation, etc.; (c) the Defendant’s mistake is divided; (d) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment; and (e) the Defendant has considerable frequency of crime and considerable amount of damage; and (e) the Defendant has not recovered from damage; and

(6 months to 2 years and 9 months).