beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.17 2017가단532046

건물인도

Text

1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant B: The real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. Defendant C is the second floor of the real estate indicated in the attached list.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an association established to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) on the area of 44,251 square meters in Nam-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City.

B. The Plaintiff obtained authorization for the establishment of the Republic of Korea on July 24, 2012 from the head of the Nam-gu Gwangju Metropolitan City, and obtained authorization for the implementation of the project on October 20, 2016.

After that, on October 30, 2017, the management and disposal plan regarding the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant project”) was authorized, and the said authorization was publicly announced on October 31, 2017.

C. Defendant B is the owner of the real estate indicated in the attached list (hereinafter “instant real estate”) located within the execution zone of the instant project, and Defendant C is the lessee who is residing in the lease of 43.92 square meters of the instant real estate from Defendant B.

On February 14, 2018, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 112,508,00 of the compensation determined by the above ruling to Defendant B on May 23, 2018, by filing an application for adjudication of expropriation with the Seoul Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee on April 18, 2018 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”) with the date of commencement of expropriation as of May 28, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to Article 81(1) of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor, a right holder, such as the owner of the previous land or structure, may not use or benefit from a management and disposition plan when the authorization of a management and disposition plan is publicly announced. However, the foregoing provision does not apply where the project operator’s consent or the compensation for losses under the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc.

According to the main sentence of Article 65 (1) of the Act on the Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions, land or buildings for the implementation of housing redevelopment improvement project and other rights are expropriated or expropriated.