근로기준법위반
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
For the reasons indicated in its holding, the court below reversed the judgment of the court of first instance that acquitted the Defendant on the facts charged of this case, and found the Defendant guilty on the ground that the Defendant’s employee sustained occupational injury while performing a panel removal work and the Defendant did not pay the Defendant medical care compensation and compensation for suspension of work.
The allegation in the grounds of appeal is nothing more than a dispute over the judgment of the court below on the selection and probative value of evidence, which belongs to the free judgment of the
In addition, even if examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal, but did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or omitting judgment
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.