성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of 10 months, the additional collection of 8 million won) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and against the nature of the defendant, there is a family member to support, and the defendant does not repeat the crime of this case.
It is advantageous to the fact that the situation is different.
However, the defendant, using the high radio wave Internet, has mediated sexual traffic against many unspecified persons, and even though the crime was committed one time, it is difficult to view it as a short-term period, and criminal proceeds are also difficult to view it as a short-term period, and the defendant has a record of being punished for suspended execution due to the same crime in 2010, and there is a record of having been punished several times due to the crime.
In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence, there is no special change in circumstances that make the sentence different from the original court’s sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.