The defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. On August 31, 2018, the Defendant committed violence, such as assaulting the faces of the above police officer two times, for example, on the top of a male convenience point, following a 112 report that male minutes drink and locked in front of a convenience point, and the head of the Tong-gu Police Station D District Unit E, sent out by the head of the Tong-gu Police Station D District Party E, who was called “Wook, shot-gu, shot-gu, shot-gu, shot-gu.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Around 02:05 on August 31, 2018, the Defendant was compelled to take custody of the Defendant for reasons under paragraph (1) within the zone D district of the Tong-gu Police Station D, the Dong-gu Police Station: (a) under the influence of alcohol, and (b) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant expressed the police officers a disturbance in the police zone, which is a governmental office, in a large voice, such as “Ig, fluor, fluoring, fluoring, cutting down, fluoring, cutting down, cutting down, cutting down, gluoring, and killing,” and (c) under the influence of alcohol for about 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties, choice of imprisonment), and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbing the principal and the choice of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the defendant's liability is not minor in light of the criminal records of the defendant's same reason for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the degree of violence against police officers, the defendant's total time of and reflects the depth of the crime, and contingent crimes.