However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 15, 2014, at around 19:45, the Defendant driven a B-lurt-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on proper initiative of, and reports on the statement of status of, a prime driver;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include three times of drinking driving and three times of licenseless driving. While the punishment power of probation was only one time, the Defendant committed the instant crime. The blood alcohol content is very high to 0.197%, and the occurrence of very dangerous traffic accidents is very high in light of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime.

However, after being sentenced to a suspended sentence in 2004, there is no criminal history as well as the punishment of a fine in 2008, and other sentencing conditions such as the family relationship of the defendant shall be taken into consideration.