업무방해등
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months and for not more than four months for each crime set forth in the holding of the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
On October 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business affairs, etc. at the Daejeon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 22, 2017. On December 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business affairs at the Gwangju District Court on December 21, 2017 and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 6, 2018.
1. Each crime on September 2, 2017 (2018 high group 74)
A. A. On September 2, 2017, the Defendant interfering with his/her business: (a) took the influence of alcohol at the “E” coffee shop operated by the victim D, Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon on September 2, 2017; (b) took a bath to the victim on his/her own; and (c) took the warning that he/she would have been paid in advance by the victim; and (d)
“Along with the face of 10 minutes of a disturbance, it interfered with the operation of a coffee shop by force by force, such as: (a) cutting the table and the chair; (b) making the door from entering the place of a disturbance for about 10 minutes; or (c) making the customers who had been in the place of the disturbance enter the place of the disturbance; or (d) allowing them to become the customers.
B. A special assault Defendant, while performing the same behavior as the mentioned in the preceding paragraph at the time and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, was employed by the victim F (19 years of age) who is an employee, will have the victim drank.
“The victim, who heard the horses, 13 years from the prison.”
10 10 10
The term “the victim’s bridge” refers to “the victim’s breath with a breath, and the victim was boomed, and the victim was boomed with a dangerous object, such as gathering the breath, which was a dangerous object on his breath, and taking away the victim’s breath, and taking a bath.
2. On March 1, 2018, the Defendant attempted to order beer in the “I” restaurant operated by the victim H on March 1, 2018, the Defendant, on March 1, 2018, (2018 top class 780), but employees J (27 third class) was unable to receive a customer at the end of the business, and thus, the Defendant would promptly be able to engage in beer and beer. The next table is not why we drink.