정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged is the defendant who uses the Kakao Scartona Guide B.
On March 7, 2017, the Defendant posted comments on the victim C and D Kakao bulletin, which is the seat of the victim C and D, and should not see the victim’s photograph “as soon as possible.”
Jams of Kasks, “Isams of Kasksks, as long as possible dial-a-a-speaks of Kasksks
(c)inciting comments, posted a false fact openly for the purpose of slandering them through the information and communications network, thereby impairing the honor of the victims;
Maz.
1. Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;
2. On February 26, 2018, after the institution of the instant indictment, the victims submitted an agreement that they do not want punishment against the Defendant.
3. Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;