2. The fact that the defendant returned home at the latest and all of the crimes of this case are recognized and reflected, and that the defendant's health is not good, is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is not appropriate in light of the fact that the sum of 150 million won from three victims during a short period of time is obtained by defraudation, and that the amount of defraudation is a considerable amount in light of the monetary value at the time of the crime, and that the defendant leaves Korea immediately after the crime of this case and continues to escape for 20 years, the crime of this case is not proper.

In particular, the defendant had been sentenced to suspended sentence due to the same fraud crime, and was under suspended sentence due to the violation of the Illegal Check Control Act at the time of the crime of this case.

In addition, in light of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy.

It does not appear.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.