A. The sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed by the defendant involved in the crime of Bosing and receiving fees from the injured party, and the nature of the crime is not very good. The amount of damage of this case is not significant, the defendant did not recover from damage, despite the fact that he had been punished for the same crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case at once during the period of repeated crime. The crime of this case was committed only once, and there are no profits acquired by the defendant, and the defendant should be considered simultaneously with the crime of larceny at night, and all other sentencing factors specified in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., are considered, and the defendant's appeal is not accepted since it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is excessive or it is unfair because it is frighten.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.