However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

[criminal record] On June 5, 2008, the defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-do branch on the charge of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on November 6, 2009.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 26, 2016, the Defendant, as a person with two or more times of drinking driving skills, driven BM5 cars while under the influence of alcohol alcohol content of about 2 km from the front of the Daegu Bank Training Institute located in the Glang-gun, Glang-gun, Gluri-gun, Gluri-si, Gluri-si, Gluri-do, to the road located in the same Myeongsan-si, Gmnsan-do, GM5 cars, which was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.094%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, and report on the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records before ruling: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a summary order;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is the number and time of punishment for the same kind of crime; the numerical value of blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving under the same case; the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment; motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of various factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case.