양수금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 66,607,713 and any of them,
A. As to KRW 10,96,926, it shall be repaid from June 26, 2007.
1. The allegations and judgment of the parties
(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;
(However, the "creditor" is deemed to be the "defendant" for the plaintiff and the "debtor". 【Based on recognition】 Each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the purport of the whole pleadings.
B. The Defendant asserted that the extinctive prescription of the instant claim has expired. However, according to the aforementioned evidence, the judgment of Gwangju District Court 2007Kadan63138, which was the previous judgment, can be recognized as the fact that the judgment of the transferee of the instant claim became final and conclusive on October 18, 2007, and the instant payment order was filed on August 23, 2017, which was prior to the lapse of 10 years thereafter, and the Defendant’s assertion cannot be accepted.
2. According to the conclusion, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money stated in the Disposition No. 1.