However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C Freight Vehicles.

On June 27, 2013, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 09:20 on June 27, 2013, and turned to the left after driving the back road of 675 east-dong Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, at an aesthetic speed from the right side to the search park.

At this point, since there is an intersection of a side road, in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely check whether there was a person, etc. who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle prior to the left-hand turn, and to check whether there is a person, etc. who has passed the road by properly examining the left-hand turn and the left-hand turn, and to prevent the accident from spreading

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not find the victim D (year 78)'s bicycle driving that was driven in the opposite direction due to the negligence of left-hand turn without examining the right-hand side and left-hand side, and had the bicycle go beyond the road by taking over the left-hand side part of the above cargo vehicle as a part above the left-hand part of the above cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, around 20:55 on July 2, 2013, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the cardiopulmonary suspension due to cerebral side, cerebral side, cerebral side, etc. at a F Hospital located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Punishment concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The circumstances and results of the accidents indicated in the judgment of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the pleadings, such as the circumstances before and after the crime, the defendant's age, environment, and records of the same crime, shall be considered, but the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the circumstances