A. The facts of recognition 1) E is the F vehicle owned by the F vehicle around 04:50 on December 20, 2018 (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

(B) Around May 1, 2006, the Defendant 1, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00

(2) Plaintiff A is the deceased’s wife, and the rest of the Plaintiffs are the deceased’s children, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract regarding the instant vehicle.

B. According to the above recognition of liability, E is responsible for compensating the deceased and the plaintiffs for damages caused by the instant accident as the operator of the instant vehicle, and the Defendant is liable for compensating for the damages as the insurer of the instant vehicle.

다. 책임의 제한 망인이 안전모를 착용하지 않은 채 자전거를 타고 신호등 없는 횡단보도를 건넜고, 이 사건 사고 시각이 새벽이므로 망인으로서도 주위를 잘 살펴 안전하게 횡단보도를 건너야 하는데 이를 게을리 한 잘못이 있는바, 이는 이 사건 사고 발생 및 손해의 확대에 기여하였으므로, 망인의 과실을 20%로 참작하여, 피고의 책임을 80%로 제한함이 상당하다.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1-1 to Gap evidence No. 3, the facts not clearly disputed, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In principle, a period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded;

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1-6, Evidence No. 9-6, and evidence No. 9.