A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and imprisonment for two years and six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Defendant A is a person with no certain occupation, and Defendant B is a person engaged in agriculture.

Defendant

A proposes to use the forged paper to Defendant B, who was a senior high school, while living in an economically difficult way without the occupation, and Defendant B accepted the above proposal.

1. Forgery of currency;

A. On September 26, 2013, from around 17:00 to 18:00, Defendant B used the 50,000 won west (F) west, which Defendant B prepared in advance, from the house of Defendant B located in Incheon Reinforcement-gun, and the Defendants, together with the Defendant, forged the front side of the above west with the multiple mixers (SCX-1455C) owned by Defendant B, and forged Chapter 6 of the Bank of Korea 50,000 west, in a way that the front and rear side of the knife is cut off.

Accordingly, the Defendants forged the paper of the Republic of Korea used in collusion for the purpose of exercising their rights.

B. At around 17:00 on September 27, 2013, Defendant B’s house located in Kimpo-si G apartment 505 Dong 1703, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, using 50,00,000 won ladne ladne ladne ladne ladne 1 (No. H) prepared by Defendant B, the Defendants together copied the front back of the above ladne with the above lag ladne with the above lag with the upper back ladne, and then forged 50,000 won ladne ladne 20 by copying the above ladne in a knif.

Accordingly, the Defendants forged the paper of the Republic of Korea used in collusion for the purpose of exercising their rights.

2. Counterfeiting counterfeited currencies;

A. Defendant B’s joint crime is waiting between Defendant A and Defendant B to the “J” located in Incheon Reinforcement-gun around 18:00 on September 26, 2013, and the following vehicles are waiting on the said vehicle. Defendant A purchased 2 A of the 6 U.S. tobacco at the market price from the said business owner K, who is aware of such forgery, and issued the said K one forged 50,000 Gabs as described in Article 1(a).