If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 17, 2020, at around 20:0, the Defendant driven a DNA car with the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.136% in the section of about 10 meters from the Ccafeteria parking lot located in Kimpo-si B to the front road of the above Ccafeteria.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the defendant's legal statement, oral statement, oral statement and control site;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (3) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order requires strictness in light of social risks and harm and injury to a crime threatening to the life or body of himself/herself and others.

The current Road Traffic Act has greatly strengthened the control standards and statutory punishment due to the social request to eradicate the harm of drinking driving.

However, considering the fact that the defendant recognized a criminal act and committed a serious reflective nature, etc. as favorable circumstances, the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, character and conduct, environment, motive leading to the criminal act in this case, circumstances after the criminal act, and all of the sentencing factors revealed in the trial process, etc., the fine imposed by the summary order cannot be deemed excessive, and thus, it is so ordered as per Disposition.