해임처분취소
1. The Defendant’s dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff on March 8, 2016 is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a probationary police officer appointed as a patrol officer on July 3, 2015, and served in Daegu Regional Police Agency B, Daegu Regional Police Agency from September 7, 2015.
B. On March 7, 2016, the Daegu Suwon Police Station General Disciplinary Committee decided to dismiss the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 57 (Duty of Good Faith), and 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act as follows. Accordingly, on March 8, 2016, the Defendant, who was the appointing authority, issued a dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff by applying Article 78(1)1 and 2 of the State Public Officials Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
[징계 사유] 경찰공무원은 공사생활을 막론하고 제반 법령과 각종 지시명령을 준수하고 성실한 복무 및 품위를 유지하여야 함에도, 2016. 2. 29. 18:00~22:00 초과근무를 신청한 후, 경사 C, 경장 D, 순경 E 등과 함께 대구 수성구 F 소재 G식당에서 소주 5병, 장어 1접시, 메밀전 1개를 시켜 나눠먹고, 같은 날 21:21경 경찰서 현관에 비치된 초과근무 지문인식기에 경사 C, 경장 D과 함께 지문등록을 한 후(이하 ‘제1비위행위’라 한다), 2차로 대구 수성구 H 소재 I 식당에서 소주 1병, 나가사키 짬뽕 1개, 음료수 2병을 시켜 나눠먹은 후 23:00경 그 식당을 나와, 2016. 3. 1. 00:15경 0.161%의 주취상태에서 대구 수성구 범어1동 소재 대구여고 담장 주변에 주차된 자신의 모닝승용차(J)를 운행하다
In the opposite part, there is any misconduct caused by contact with EXE vehicles and by causing traffic accidents (hereinafter referred to as 'the second corruption') (hereinafter referred to as 'the second corruption') (hereinafter referred to as 'the second corruption').
C. The Plaintiff filed an appeal petition with the Ministry of Personnel Management seeking mitigation of the instant disposition, but the said appeals review committee rendered a decision to dismiss the said petition petition review on June 21, 2016.