2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the act of exchanging tangible and intangible results acquired through the use of game products promotion of an excessive speculative spirit and that there is a great social harm as a result of a crime that undermines sound labor awareness; (b) the Defendant has operated money exchange business for eight months; (c) there is no particular change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the lower judgment; and (d) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the records and pleadings of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, background and method of the crime; and (e) circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed on the Defendant may be determined as appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.