Defendant

The ground of appeal that the above defendant is not subject to a judgment ex officio is not a legitimate ground of appeal as it is alleged in the ground of appeal by the court below.

Defendant

A’s assertion of mistake is merely an error of fact-finding by the fact-finding court in accordance with the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

In addition, even if the grounds alleged in the grounds of appeal are examined in light of the evidence duly admitted, the judgment of the court below that found the above defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case does not err by violating the logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the free evaluation

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the Defendants, the assertion that the sentencing of the sentence is unfair is

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.