At around 20:50 on April 10, 2014, the Defendant drinked alcoholic beverages together with “D,” located in Sinju-si, Sinju-si, with “F (50 years of age) for the victim, who was living together, E, and E, living together, and the old living together. Although the Defendant proposed that the victim wanted to do so to E, the Defendant would disregard the victim and continue to do so. However, the Defendant saw that the victim would want to do so. However, the Defendant spawn the head part of the victim’s body with an empty disease, which is a dangerous object bable to do so. On the other hand, the Defendant spawn the victim’s head part at one time, and boomed the victim, followed by the victim, and followed by the victim, and the victim spawn the victim’s back to the victim’s face out of the above frequency.

As a result, the Defendant carried an empty cattle, which is a dangerous thing, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as a complete escape from the upper right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Reporting on the dispatch site conditions;

1. Each injury diagnosis certificate (F), a copy of medical records, and a diagnosis certificate (F);

1. Application of damaged photographs and on-site photographs statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case in the reason of sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (hereinafter referred to as the following reason for sentencing) committed an assault against the victim, such as: (a) the Defendant, while drinking with the victim, has been doing a dispute with the victim while having been drinking; and (b) continuously taking the face of the victim due to an empty juvenile’s illness; and (c) the nature of the offense is very heavy in light of the risk of committing the crime or the degree of injury suffered by the victim.

Although the defendant made a deposit of KRW 2.5 million for the victim, he did not go against the fault of the victim, he did not go against the truth of the victim.