However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On January 16, 2016, at around 03:30 on January 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) went to the victim E (26 years old) (hereinafter “D”) where the Defendant located in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu (hereinafter “Seoul Mapo-gu”) was seated in the table, and was seated out of the table, but the Defendant was faced with the victim’s head at a three-dimensional fluor of the hyp (40cm in length) of the hyp (40cm in length) of the hyp of the hyp, which is a dangerous object that the victim would not move; and (b) brought the damaged person out of the body and body of the hyp, resulting in the victim’s injury, such as the head covered by the head and body requiring approximately 2 weeks medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see the following grounds for suspension of execution):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the defendant has become the majority majority, the fact that his mistake is divided, the fact that he seems to have an excessive behavioral disorder, and the degree of injury to the victim caused by the instant case is not much serious);