물품대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 29,818,290 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 6% from January 4, 2015 to November 6, 2015, and the following.
1. In addition to the entire purport of the pleadings as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including additional numbers), the plaintiff agreed to continue to supply piping materials with the defendant and to trade them by settling the price. The plaintiff supplied piping materials to the defendant from August 4, 201 to June 25, 2014. The defendant's price for the goods unpaid to the plaintiff can be acknowledged as constituting a cause of 34,818,290 as of July 1, 2014. The plaintiff was a person who received reimbursement of KRW 5,00,000 from the defendant around August 2015 and appropriated for principal.
Therefore, barring special circumstances, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of the goods price of KRW 29,818,290 (i.e., KRW 34,818,290 - KRW 5,000) and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the provisions of the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, etc. from the following day until November 6, 2015, which is the date of rendering the judgment of this case, to disputes over the existence and scope of the Defendant’s obligation to pay as to the Plaintiff the original copy of the instant payment order, as sought by the Plaintiff.
(A) The Plaintiff claims for the payment of damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from January 4, 2015 to the date of full payment. However, the provision on statutory interest rate under the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings is amended on September 25, 2015 and entered into force on October 1, 2015, and the annual interest rate of 15% per annum shall apply from October 1, 2015 in cases where the pleading is terminated after October 1, 2015. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion on the Defendant’s defense on October 2, 2015
A. On November 1, 2011, the Defendant asserted that the amount equivalent to the claim for the price of the goods was extinguished by paying KRW 9,641,614 to the Plaintiff on November 1, 201.
According to the statement in Eul evidence No. 1, November 1, 201.