대기환경보전법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (3 million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.
2. It seems that the Defendant’s health is not good and economicly difficult.
However, the court below seems to have determined the punishment by reducing the amount of fine according to the summary order in consideration of such circumstances.
In addition, even though one defendant had two criminal records of the same kind, it is not good that the crime of this case is committed again.
In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances following the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too excessive and is not deemed unfair. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.