beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2013.10.31 2013고합32

일반건조물방화

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On October 19, 200, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and six months in Seoul High Court on October 19, 200, and one year and six months in Seoul High Court on November 13, 2002, and one year and six months in Seoul High Court on October 28, 2005, and one year and six years in imprisonment on October 6, 2007 due to general automobile fire-prevention in the leisure branch of the Suwon District Court, etc.; on January 10, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for general buildings and fire-prevention at the Gwangju District Court; on September 3, 2008, one year and six months in imprisonment with prison labor for general buildings and attempted fire-prevention at Seoul High Court on April 15, 2010, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 6, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 03:53 on January 21, 2013, the Defendant purchased 1 disease, World Cup, 1, and 1 Lane at the F convenience store located adjacent to the “E” building operated by D, which was operated by D in Gyeonggi-si, and had the Defendant scam to see whether the above advertising office was a fire in the building of the above advertising office by using Lane purchased in front of the above advertising office.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) attached to the paper studs located adjacent to the advertising office by putting the said studs into the above studs; (b) caused the said studs to spread to the entire “H” manpower office operated by G in the same building as the office; (c) destroyed all the studs of the D’s market price of KRW 54,20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol of interrogation of the accused by the prosecution against the accused (excluding the part of the protocol of interrogation of the prosecution where the accused denies the actual authenticity, which was the following to the 282 defendant 2-2 21 of the investigation record No. 35 of the protocol of interrogation of the prosecution where the accused denies the actual authenticity, and the statement from the 283 defendant 1

1. Each police statement of D, G, and I.