A. In the E branch office, E branch office and conference room (hereinafter “instant conference room”), the Defendant was guilty of the charges of this case against the Defendant, even though the victim F was involved in assault from G at the above branch office outside the conference room of this case (hereinafter “instant office”) located on the day of this case, and the victim’s standing room outside the conference room of this case (hereinafter “instant office”). The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Even if the facts charged of this case of unfair sentencing are found guilty, in light of the circumstances leading to the instant crime, and the victim’s wife mainly resulted from the instant G assault, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the witness J of the trial, and the testimony of F. The following circumstances are: ① The victim, from the investigative agency to the court of the trial, stated in a relatively consistent manner that “the defendant was at the time from the meeting room of this case to the court of the trial to the court of the trial, he was at the time of 1 to 2 times his face, such as flaging his own head with his own head with his own head with his flag, and flag with his flag, and flag with his flag with his flag with his head with his flag with flag, etc.” The victim suffered violence from G at the office of this case, but was at the time of flag with his head with his flag, etc., but did not have his head with his flag with his head with his flag.” < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20600, Feb. 2, 20198>