Defendants are N (Defendant A),O (Defendant B), P (Defendant C), and each bureau chief (s) of M (only referred to as the “instant branch”) of the National Public Service Trade Union M branch of the Democratic Labor Union M (hereinafter referred to as the “instant branch”) as employees of M (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”).

On November 6, 2009, the Defendants directed union members to take part in the strike and court attendance. At around 15:00 on the same day, the Defendants participated in the common strike for the advancement of the public sector and the enhancement of social public nature in front of the government and the National Office located in the Central Office in Jungcheon-si, 15:00 on the same day, and interfered with M’s business by force by refusing to provide labor to a group by failing to attend the relevant workplace. 2. The prosecutor asserted that the instant branch was consistent with the public prosecutor’s strike for the advancement of public enterprises within 2009. The instant branch, including the instant branch, was established with nine labor unions affiliated with the Democratic Labor Union and Transportation Association, and the Defendants’ collective refusal to provide labor to the public sector, which was established with nine labor groups affiliated with the Democratic Labor Union and Labor Group. The Defendants’ major purpose of collective bargaining is not to introduce the new industrial action for the promotion of the industrial action and its relation to the industrial action of public enterprises through the introduction of the new industrial action plan.