However, for the defendant A, B, and D, two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D are ex post facto marriage relationship, and victim I(23 tax), victim J(22 tax) and victim K(23 tax) are friendship relationship.

Defendant

A, as a follow-up part of the victim K on June 25, 2017, was assaulted by the victim of the above damage, and had a good appraisal against the above victim, and the defendant A was willing to look at the above victim with the defendant C, B, and D.

Defendant

A around 04:00 on the 26th day of the same month, at the 'M' house in the 04:00, he was called from the victim K to talk about the above preceding day, and sought the above victim together with Defendant C, Defendant B, and Defendant D.

Defendant

A는 피해자 K에게 “ 일대 일로 맞짱을 한번 뜨자. ”라고 시비를 걸어 위 술집 밖으로 피해자 K, 피해자 J와 함께 내려오게 되었고, 피해자 I가 피해자 K을 찾던 중 피고인 D의 멱살을 잡으면서 싸움이 시작되었다.

Defendant

D When the victim I am the part of the victim I am, the defendant A am the victim I am the victim I am with two descendants, and the defendant B am the victim I am the victim I am the victim I by two losses.

Defendant

D is described as the victim I's face, and the defendant D and the defendant B's indictment also stated as the defendant A, but the defendant A is arguing that there is no fact that the victim I, which is written on the floor, has been directly.

According to evidence, at the time when the victim I was used on the floor, the defendant A seems to have been in dispute with the victim K, so the defendant A has accepted the witness K recording and the police statement) and the defendant's argument and partly changed the facts charged.

In the event of this drinking and so on, the victim I suffered injury to the victim I, including dental services that require treatment for a period of 29 days.

The victim K has been used on the floor when the victim K had a conflict with the defendant A.