2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects it, and that the Defendant committed recidivism such as disposing of vehicles after the instant case, and that there are children to be supported, and that there are no previous convictions.

However, it is also recognized that the Defendant had a previous record of the punishment for a total of four times, including one of the suspended sentence of imprisonment due to drunk driving, and that the Defendant had a previous record of the suspended sentence of imprisonment once due to a non-licensed driving, and that the blood alcohol concentration of the instant case is very high to 0.191%.

In addition, in full view of the following circumstances: Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of crime, means and consequence of crime, etc., and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.