If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 30, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with labor at the Incheon District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2013.

The defendant had no intention or ability to pay taxi charges even if he/she takes a taxi.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 23:57 on March 12, 2013, did not pay 5,700 won of taxi charges without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was aboard a private taxi of the Victim B in front of the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City State Station of the Jeju-gu, Incheon, and arrived in front of the water distribution station of the Incheon Southern-gu Incheon, the destination.

In this respect, the Defendant took property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Results of case search, and application of three copies of judgment Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.