2. Determination: (a) The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the following circumstances recognized by the court below are: (b) the victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court of the court below that he was injured as stated in the facts charged from the defendant at the time of the instant case; (c) G and H also consistently stated the same purport from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below; (d) the police officer F dispatched to the scene of the instant case upon receipt of the victim’s report from the court of the court below to the court of the court of the court below; and (d) the victim expressed that he was injured with the victim’s head at the time of receiving the victim’s report; and (d) on April 25, 2011, the victim took full account of the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.