When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the pastor of the disabled church with the first degree of visual disability, and C is a pastor who holds the E church conference located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

The Defendant, while operating G Co., Ltd. in the Chungcheongbuk-gun F, provided the above factory and site as security on around 196, borrowed the company’s operating funds by borrowing KRW 1.5 billion from the victim I’s real estate as security on December 1, 1996, and used the company’s operating funds by borrowing KRW 1.5 billion, but did not change this, the Defendant, as he did not lose the ownership of the above factory and site, did so in collusion with H and the victim, etc.

I would like to think.

Accordingly, the defendant demanded the return of money by finding the victim, and accordingly, he was punished for refusing to leave, and he was also subject to the decision to dispose of the victim's access.

In addition, the defendant was detained by his wife.

I think, from November 2, 2014 to December 1, 2014, on June 2, 2015, Seoul Southern District Court issued a summary order of fines of two million won as defamation by openly pointing out false facts four times in total.

1. Nevertheless, the Defendant and C, in collusion with the non-person with respect to the name of the visually disabled person, from May 7, 2015 to September 1, 2015, urged the victim to return the strong and strong property, i.e., the real owner A, who owns the visually disabled person-friendly K, in front of the Ktel located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul to the victim’s operation.

“The banner” shall be posted, and a strong A with strong seizure of property of visually disabled persons shall be strong.

“The property of a visual disabled person with a conscience, i.e., returning the property of a visual disabled person with a conscience,” and whether “the visual disabled person belongs to and is not slick to his/her descendants once.”

“To create the contents indicated in the PPet by inserting the PPet, and to string the same place, many and unspecified persons with a first-class visual disability who seem to be above all, with the intention of fraud-friendly K Office and K (J) having strong ownership.

“.....”