대여금
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 29,487,00 and the interest rate of KRW 18% per annum from October 1, 2007 to the date of full payment.
On May 25, 2007, the Plaintiff drafted a notarial deed stating that although the Defendants are Daegu Law Firm with the Defendants, the Defendants are currently liable to pay KRW 29,487,000 as the law office No. 1143, and that the Defendants are now liable to pay the said obligations in equal installments as of the end of each month from September 2007 to May 2009, the Defendants shall pay the said obligations in equal installments as of the end of each month, and if the said repayment is delayed, the Plaintiff shall lose the benefit of time (Article 6(3)) and the damages for delay shall be 1.5% per month.
The Defendants delayed the repayment of the said installment from the first time.
The above facts are deemed to have been led by the above defendant between the plaintiff and the defendant C, and the plaintiff and the defendant B can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings. Thus, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 18% per annum, which is the day following the day of loss of the term interest to the plaintiff from October 1, 2007 to the day of full payment.
The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the Plaintiff is liable to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum pursuant to the Promotion Act from the next day of the delivery of the complaint. However, since the rate of damages for delay under the Promotion Act was less than the rate of damages for delay of the contract from October 1, 2015, prior to the delivery of the complaint to the Defendants, the Plaintiff’s claim for the portion exceeding the
On the other hand, there is no evidence to acknowledge that Defendant B paid 20 million won or more between them.
Therefore, among the plaintiff's claims against the defendants, those within the above recognition scope are justified, and the remainder is without merit, and it is dismissed as per Disposition.