2. The Defendant consistently states that, from an investigative agency to this court, there was only one time at the time and place of the facts charged from the victim to the victim’s scam with scams, and that there was no injury on the victim by taking the victim’s scambling beyond the victim’s scambling as stated in the above facts charged.

In full view of the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the instant facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① 피고인이 위 공소사실과 같이 피해자의 뺨을 주먹으로 때리고 넘어져 있는 피해자를 발로 밟고 찼다는 점을 인정할 직접적인 증거로는 피해자의 진술만이 있을 뿐이다.

However, according to the following circumstances, it is difficult to believe the above statement of the victimized person.

(1) The victim, from the investigative agency to this court, was unable to get the victim from the victim to the victim’s “ even though the defendant tried to get her glass well on which she had been living room, she was unable to get her from the wind to prevent women working in Korea.

“The statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in this Court, the witness F, working at one Council member, "The defendant entered the medical room and entered almost close to the scene, and the defendant was living under the sofa, and the victim was sitting under the sofa.

The victim was expected to sit from the mixed sub-sponsed floor, and the noise of the future was sponsed.