2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

가. 원고는 2012. 5. 31.부터 유한회사 엘피스에서 근무하던 중 2012. 10. 11. 25kg 의 사료 포대를 차에 싣는 과정에서 허리를 삐끗하는 부상을 입었고(이하 ‘이 사건 재해’라 한다), 2012. 10. 25.부터 요추 염좌, 제4-5번 요추간 추간판 탈출증(이하 ‘기승인상병’이라 한다)으로 요양하던 중, 2013. 7. 15. 기승인상병에 대하여 현미경하 추간판 제거술을 받았으나 요통 등 증상이 계속되자, 2014. 1. 21. 요추 제3-4번간 추간판 탈출증(이하 ‘이 사건 상병’이라 한다)에 대하여 추가상병 승인신청을 하였다.

On January 29, 2014, the defendant issued an additional measure for non-approval of injury and disease (hereinafter "the disposition of this case") on the ground that there is no opinion on escape from a post signboard between 3-4 and MIM's necessity for inspection as a result of consultation by the advisory society.

B. The Plaintiff filed a petition for review against the Defendant regarding the instant disposition, but the opinion of protruding and chronic pressure between MIM No. 3-4 of the 3-4 of the MIM’s necessity for inspection was insignificant, and there was no obvious confirmation of the opinion of escape from the instant side of the instant case. Thus, it was dismissed on March 20, 2014 on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation with the instant disaster or the instant upper branch. Although the Plaintiff filed a petition for review with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, it did not seem to have the opinion of escape from the instant side of the MRI’s main test No. 3-4 of the MRI’s necessity for inspection, and the extent of expansion is observed. Considering that the galle is not caused by a one-time external trauma but by a long time change, it was dismissed on May 16, 2014 on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation between the instant disaster or the instant upper branch on the instant approval.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3 evidence, Eul 1 to 10 evidence (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.