However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is not a person dealing with narcotics, who operates a hall located in Busan Jin-gu B.

1. On January 1, 2018, the Defendant administered Meteptop ca (one philophone; hereinafter referred to as “philophone”) 0.03g, a local mental medicine, at the head of the above party-gu, 21:00, in a cloppa, in a cloppa, in a cloppa, in a way that sloppa sloppa sloppa

2. On January 26, 2018, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of philophones in the upper scopon site at around 02:00 by means of drinking in water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report on the prosecution, the written appraisal and the written appraisal and the report on investigation (calculated additionally);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., for the sake of facts constituting an offense, and Articles 60 (1) 3, and 4 (1) 3 (b) of the same Act, applicable to the choice of

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. The grounds for sentencing under the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc. [the scope of the recommended sentence] medication, simple possession, etc.