2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had the same criminal records three times; (b) the Defendant’s blood alcohol content at the time of drunk driving was high by 0.186%; (c) the Defendant was found to have committed an offense; (d) the Defendant reflects the mistake while committing an offense; (e) there was no criminal record heavier than fines; (e) the Defendant was discovered due to drunk driving; (e) the Defendant was required to engage in his studies as a graduate student; and (e) the Defendant was required to engage in his studies; and (e) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing specified in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct, motive for committing an offense, and conditions before and after committing

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.