A. The Plaintiff was a legally married couple who completed the marriage report on April 21, 2001 and Nonparty C (1970 male, hereinafter referred to as “A”) and his/her husband and wife on April 21, 2001, and had Category D (the birth in 2002), E (the birth in 2007), and F (the birth in 2012).

B. C has been actively involved in the establishment of G Co., Ltd. with its main business purposes such as clothes and subsidiary materials wholesale and retail business on April 2007 and operated as a substantial representative.

The defendant was registered as the representative director of the above company in 2014 as a woman living in 1973 and was in charge of fund management, and the defendant was also in charge of directly remitting the living expenses of the plaintiff's family to the plaintiff.

C. From around 2012, the Defendant was aware of the fact that it had brought about C with the wheels relationship, and upon the Plaintiff’s request on July 28, 2017, the Defendant prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff a letter containing the following: “C and the Defendant recognize the unknown fact for five years. There is no communication and correspondence with the prohibition of telephone conversations and e-mail, and the Defendant shall not pay KRW 100 million to the Plaintiff at the time of the violation of this provision.”

During the period of the above five years, the Defendant read C as “B” during the conversation via H text messages, and exchanged C with a close indication, such as “I want to marry at any time during our marriage. I wish to marry.” This is called “I am on the New Marriage, I am. I am on the New Marriage,” and C, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am,” and “I am, I are

E. At the time of frequent travel and overseas stay in Indonesia for a considerable period of time, the Defendant placed the Defendant’s brush, cosmetics, raw materials, and clothes in C’s dwelling place, and the Defendant was traveling to Hong Kong along with C as well as in the hotel room.

F. The defendant becomes aware of the relationship with C with the plaintiff, and accordingly, after the extinguishment of the plaintiff and C with C became worse, the president of the 'Cambibibibibibibs to C on the date unfolded. I think that the president of the 'Cambibibibibibi