특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
Criminal power is punished by a fine of one million won, and 2003, for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) on October 23, 2001, in the net support of the Gwangju District Court.
3.6. A summary order was issued on May 16, 200 to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) on May 16, 2008, to a fine of four million won on April 12, 2010, and to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).
Criminal facts
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a SP area B.
Although the Defendant had been punished twice or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) as above, the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.219% on June 29, 2013 and driven the vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.219% on the same day as that of the blood alcohol level on June 29, 2013, and driven the front road of the Pungju station in front of the Pungju station in the 382-10%-dong Ordinance of 1, 2013 at the speed of 40km from the wall of the Municipal Ordinance to the face of the Gungro Hospital.
At the same time, there is a place near the intersection, where the passage of the vehicle is frequent, and there is a vehicle under stop in accordance with the signals such as cross-road signal at the front direction of the defendant, so the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly manipulate the front direction and prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering and brake system, so that the defendant engaged in driving the motor vehicle has a duty of care.
Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to find out the IM5 car driven by the victim C (SM) who was under a stop due to the signal signal from the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in which the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to such an extent that the walk is long-distance and the horse is unbread, and the Defendant was under the influence of driving the vehicle in the front side of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in which the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and the part of the back part of the IM5 car driven by the victim was under the influence of the vehicle in front of the vehicle.
Accordingly, the defendant is driving a motor vehicle in a state where it is difficult to drive it normally due to influence of drinking.